{"version":"1.9","identifier":"abbb1a72-588f-42ad-9a7e-b1ad889d7b61","language":"en-US","title":"Bernie Sanders will not back Schumer for Democratic leader. The caucus vote is still ahead","layout":{"columns":7,"width":1024,"margin":32,"gutter":20},"componentLayouts":{"text":{"columnStart":0,"columnSpan":7,"maximumContentWidth":720,"margin":{"top":12,"bottom":12}},"photo":{"columnStart":0,"columnSpan":7,"margin":{"top":20,"bottom":20}}},"componentTextStyles":{"default":{"fontName":"HelveticaNeue","fontSize":18,"lineHeight":29,"textColor":"#171717"},"headline":{"fontName":"HelveticaNeue-Bold","fontSize":36,"lineHeight":42,"conditional":[{"conditions":{"maxViewportWidth":480},"fontSize":28,"lineHeight":34}]},"intro":{"fontName":"HelveticaNeue","fontSize":20,"lineHeight":28,"textColor":"#555555"},"caption":{"fontName":"HelveticaNeue","fontSize":13,"lineHeight":19,"textColor":"#666666"},"byline":{"fontName":"HelveticaNeue","fontSize":13,"lineHeight":20,"textColor":"#666666"},"body":{"fontName":"HelveticaNeue","fontSize":18,"lineHeight":29,"paragraphSpacingAfter":14,"linkStyle":{"textColor":"#00704a"}}},"metadata":{"canonicalURL":"https://567politics.com/news/bernie-sanders-will-not-support-chuck-schumer-democratic-leader-november-2026","datePublished":"2026-11-10T21:03:19.581835Z","dateModified":"2026-11-10T21:09:07.599242Z","authors":["567 Politics staff"],"excerpt":"The Vermont independent, who caucuses with Democrats, said it is time for change. Schumer says he is confident. The conference vote is expected in December.","thumbnailURL":"https://pub-fac99da959e344fe99d810d309cef7df.r2.dev/photos/article/abbb1a72-588f-42ad-9a7e-b1ad889d7b61/8edf1277e4666b61cf137039ecaedb1b.jpg","keywords":["elections"],"generatorName":"Frog News","generatorVersion":"1.0"},"components":[{"role":"title","text":"Bernie Sanders will not back Schumer for Democratic leader. The caucus vote is still ahead","textStyle":"headline","layout":"text"},{"role":"intro","text":"The Vermont independent, who caucuses with Democrats, said it is time for change. Schumer says he is confident. The conference vote is expected in December.","textStyle":"intro","layout":"text"},{"role":"byline","text":"By 567 Politics staff · Published November 10, 2026","textStyle":"byline","layout":"text"},{"role":"photo","URL":"https://pub-fac99da959e344fe99d810d309cef7df.r2.dev/photos/article/abbb1a72-588f-42ad-9a7e-b1ad889d7b61/8edf1277e4666b61cf137039ecaedb1b.jpg","caption":"Sen. Bernie Sanders speaking at a rally in Tempe, Arizona, on March 20, 2025. Photo by Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/). · Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 2.0","accessibilityCaption":"Sen. Bernie Sanders speaking at a rally in Tempe, Arizona, on March 20, 2025. Photo by Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/).","layout":"photo"},{"role":"caption","text":"Sen. Bernie Sanders speaking at a rally in Tempe, Arizona, on March 20, 2025. Photo by Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/). · Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 2.0","textStyle":"caption","layout":"text"},{"role":"body","format":"markdown","text":"Sen. [Bernie Sanders](https://567politics.com/politicians/bernie-sanders) said Tuesday that he will not support Sen. [Chuck Schumer](https://567politics.com/politicians/chuck-schumer) for reelection as Senate Democratic leader, telling reporters at the Capitol that \"the time is now for change.\" The announcement is independently confirmed by contemporaneous reporting from the press conference and by television video of the remarks that circulated on X before a widely shared Polymarket alert treated the comments as breaking news. It does not, by itself, decide the race. No formal challenger has entered, Schumer has said he is confident he will keep the job, and Senate Democrats are expected to vote in early December, after the midterm election that is projected to give the party the majority in January.\n\nThe distinction matters for how the news was framed. Polymarket, a prediction-market company whose account often posts unsourced alerts, described Sanders as refusing to back Schumer \"for Senate Majority Leader.\" The more precise office at stake in the caucus is Democratic leader. If Democrats organize the Senate in the next Congress, the person elected to that post becomes majority leader. Sanders, an independent from Vermont who caucuses with Democrats, used the narrower wording.\n\n\"I personally have known Chuck Schumer for over 30 years, and I like Chuck. Nobody who works harder than Chuck Schumer. But in my view, the time is now for change, and I will not be supporting Chuck to be reelected as the Democratic leader,\" Sanders said, according to [CBS News](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bernie-sanders-chuck-schumer-democratic-leader-senate/), which reported the remarks at 3:39 p.m. Eastern on November 10, 2026, from reporters Stefan Becket and Kaia Hubbard.\n\nA 44-second clip of the same passage circulated earlier that afternoon. Aaron Rupar, a progressive-leaning journalist who often posts television clips, published the video on X at 3:06 p.m. Eastern, with a caption saying Sanders announced, \"I will not be supporting Chuck.\" The footage is from MS NOW's program \"The Moment,\" anchored by Katy Tur. On-screen graphics identified the remarks as coming from Capitol Hill \"moments ago\" and showed a live clock at 3:03 p.m., then 3:04 p.m. Eastern. In the video, Sanders is at a podium delivering the same lines later quoted by CBS News, including that he has known Schumer for more than 30 years, that he likes him, that \"nobody who works harder than Chuck Schumer,\" and that he \"will not be supporting Chuck to be reelected as the Democratic leader.\" The clip also includes Sanders saying \"we need a process\" and calling for \"a vigorous debate about the direction of the Democratic Party,\" plus the line that Democrats need to \"have that out in the open to show the American people that a new day has come and that their votes meant a new direction in Washington,\" language that matches the CBS account. 567 Politics reviewed the posted video. A search did not turn up a standalone MS NOW story page or a C-SPAN recording of the full news conference, so those originals are not independently opened here.\n\n\n\n\n\nPolymarket's post, published at 3:32 p.m. Eastern the same afternoon, 26 minutes after Rupar's clip, contained no link to a transcript, video, or news organization. The quote it highlighted is real. The underlying reporting is not the post.\n\n## Sanders tied the midterm result to a leadership argument\n\nSanders placed the refusal in a larger claim about the November 3 election. He said the midterms were \"about change,\" and he described families who, in his telling, are struggling under high costs while a \"billionaire class\" accumulates wealth. He called for \"a vigorous debate about the direction of the Democratic Party.\" Those lines were reported by CBS News from the same Capitol appearance.\n\nThe argument is a familiar one for Sanders, who has spent years criticizing both parties for being too close to large donors and concentrated wealth. It is also a political claim, not a documented bargain. A 567 Politics snapshot of Federal Election Commission Form 3, line 11C, committee contributions for Schumer's 2026 cycle, retrieved at 7:16 a.m. Eastern on November 9, listed transfers from several corporate political action committees, including $10,000 from the Humana Inc. political action committee, $7,500 from the Procter & Gamble Good Government Fund, $5,000 from the Eli Lilly PAC, $5,000 from the Molina Healthcare PAC, and $2,500 from the Boeing PAC. Those figures are a slice of one disclosure line, not Schumer's career fundraising, not his total receipts, and not proof that any contribution purchased a vote or a leadership arrangement. Schumer is not on the 2026 ballot; his current term runs through 2028. The same snapshot for Sanders's 2026-cycle committee showed no line 11C contributions listed, which is consistent with an off-year after his 2024 reelection and is not a statement that he raised no money from other sources.\n\nSanders also predicted that Schumer would not have a clear field. \"He's not going to run unopposed, I don't think,\" he said, according to CBS News and later accounts of the same exchange. He declined to say whether he is encouraging Sen. [Chris Van Hollen](https://567politics.com/politicians/chris-van-hollen) of Maryland to run. Van Hollen has still not formally declared a challenge.\n\nThe Democratic Party's U.S. profile on 567 Politics, reviewed on November 5, 2026, places the party at −1 on the economic axis and −3 on the social axis. Those coordinates are dated editorial estimates, not measured scores, and they describe a party, not a single senator. They are useful here only as context for a fight that Sanders has framed as a debate over the party's direction.\n\n[Explore the political spectrum on 567politics](https://567politics.com/political-spectrum?country=united-states)\n\n## Slotkin appeared with Sanders and left her vote open\n\nSen. [Elissa Slotkin](https://567politics.com/politicians/elissa-slotkin) of Michigan appeared with Sanders at the Capitol. She said she is \"not actively seeking this job\" but is \"seeking change,\" according to CBS News. She also set a condition that applies to Schumer and to any alternative: \"Whoever wants my vote is going to have to show me a concrete plan that's definitively different,\" and \"I'm a no until and unless I see that from anyone.\"\n\nThat is a different position from Sanders's. Sanders has already said he will not support Schumer. Slotkin has said she is a no unless someone, including a would-be challenger, produces a governing plan she regards as clearly different from the status quo. Her remarks do not constitute a candidacy, and they do not, on the public record, lock her in against every possible ticket.\n\nThe appearance itself is part of the story. A sitting Democratic senator joining an independent colleague at a press conference to talk about leadership, days after a midterm that is projected to hand Democrats the Senate, is a public signal that the race is not a closed conversation even if the whip count remains private.\n\n## Schumer has said he will be reelected and, on Tuesday, that he is confident\n\nSchumer's public line has been consistent since the election. On November 4, he told [Roll Call](https://rollcall.com/2026/11/04/will-be-reelected-as-majority-leader-schumer-says/), \"I'll be reelected as majority leader.\" He added, \"The issue is not me. The issue is focusing on the American people and what they want.\" Former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, speaking to Roll Call after the party's strong night, said he doubted anyone would challenge Schumer. A Democratic staffer quoted in the same article was more blunt: \"Nope. Schumer will be the leader.\"\n\nThose comments predate Sanders's Tuesday announcement. They remain the most direct public statements from Schumer and from people around the conference who want the current leader to stay. On Tuesday, [Bloomberg Government](https://news.bgov.com/bloomberg-government-news/sanders-says-he-wont-support-schumer-for-democratic-leader) reported that Schumer, asked whether he was confident he would be elected majority leader, answered \"yes.\" The Bloomberg dispatch is paywalled; the \"yes\" is taken from that report's available account of the exchange, not from an independently opened transcript.\n\nAides have also been described, in other outlets, as saying Schumer already has the votes. Common Dreams, a left-aligned news site, cited a New York Times weekend report that Schumer's aides said he had locked down another term by securing enough commitments of support. 567 Politics could not independently open that Times story on Tuesday. A [prior 567 Politics report](https://567politics.com/news/schumer-van-hollen-jeffries-leadership-pressure-israel-november-2026) on the draft-Van Hollen effort, published November 9, similarly recorded claims that Schumer's operation believed it had the votes, including reporting attributed to Vanity Fair. None of those accounts is a public whip count. Secret-ballot rules, discussed below, also limit how much an early commitment can be verified from the outside.\n\n## The vote is a conference election, not a public referendum\n\nThe Senate Democratic Conference publishes its rules. [Those rules](https://www.democrats.senate.gov/rules-for-the-democratic-conference) provide that officers are elected beginning no earlier than December preceding the next Congress. If a leadership election is contested, the vote is by secret ballot, and the winner needs a majority of members present and voting. Senators-elect may attend and participate at the invitation of the Conference Chair. Proxies are authorized.\n\nRoll Call reported on November 4 that the vote is expected in early December and that it will be a secret ballot that includes senators-elect. That description is consistent with the published rules, which set a December floor for the election and allow the chair to include incoming members.\n\nThe arithmetic is tighter than a viral post can capture. [CBS News](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bernie-sanders-chuck-schumer-democratic-leader-senate/) described Democrats as headed for a caucus of at least 54 members in the next Senate. [Roll Call](https://rollcall.com/2026/11/04/will-be-reelected-as-majority-leader-schumer-says/) has used a range of 54 to 56. In a 54-member conference, a simple majority of those present and voting is 28 if everyone is in the room. A 567 Politics account of the [midterm result](https://567politics.com/news/democrats-win-senate-majority-six-flips-kansas-iowa-trump-accepts-results-november-2026) documented Democratic flips, including in Kansas and Iowa, that produced the projected majority. Those seat gains are why the December vote is expected to choose a majority leader rather than a minority leader. They do not tell readers how the secret ballot will go.\n\nSanders's own vote is one vote. Incoming senators who have already said they will not back Schumer add more, but a handful of public holdouts is not, by itself, a blocking coalition. The public record still lacks a named, formal alternative on the ballot.\n\n**Senate Democratic leadership fight, November 2026**\n\n* **Nov. 3–4, 2026**: Democrats are projected to take the Senate. Schumer tells Roll Call he will be reelected as majority leader.\n* **Early November 2026**: Several incoming Democratic senators tell reporters they will not support Schumer for leader.\n* **Nov. 10, 2026**: Sanders says at a Capitol press conference that he will not support Schumer for Democratic leader.\n* **Early December 2026**: Conference rules provide that officers are elected beginning no earlier than December. Contested elections are by secret ballot.\n\nSource: [Roll Call, Nov. 4, 2026](https://rollcall.com/2026/11/04/will-be-reelected-as-majority-leader-schumer-says/), [The Guardian, Nov. 6, 2026, updated Nov. 9](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/nov/06/chuck-schumer-majority-leader-incoming-democratic-senators), [CBS News, Nov. 10, 2026](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bernie-sanders-chuck-schumer-democratic-leader-senate/), [Senate Democratic Conference rules](https://www.democrats.senate.gov/rules-for-the-democratic-conference)\n\n## Van Hollen is calling colleagues and has not declared\n\nVan Hollen remains the name most often attached to a possible challenge, and he remains undeclared. On Tuesday he said he is \"in the process right now of calling my colleagues\" and is \"actively calling my colleagues,\" according to CBS News. Bloomberg Government reported that he wants a plan that includes ending the Iran war and helping bring down prices. The Iran demand sits against a separate, earlier fight in the [Democratic caucus over war funding and public opinion](https://567politics.com/news/iran-war-majority-voters-schumer-jeffries-funding-test-2026). It is a stated priority from Van Hollen, not evidence that a formal platform has been circulated or that a leadership ballot has been printed.\n\nThe November 9 567 Politics story on this contest reported that a draft-Van Hollen campaign and a related fight over Israel policy were real, and that Van Hollen had not yet challenged Schumer. Tuesday's comments do not change that formal status. They do show that he is taking soundings after the midterm and after a week in which incoming members made their skepticism public.\n\nThat earlier skepticism is documented. [The Guardian](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/nov/06/chuck-schumer-majority-leader-incoming-democratic-senators), in a November 6 report updated November 9, and Roll Call, on November 4, identified incoming senators who have declined to commit to Schumer, including Annie Andrews of South Carolina, Adam Hamilton of Kansas, Abdul El-Sayed of Michigan, James Talarico of Texas, Juliana Stratton of Illinois, Chris Pappas of New Hampshire, Peggy Flanagan of Minnesota, and Troy Jackson of Maine. El-Sayed has said Van Hollen would \"be an amazing Senate majority leader\" if he wants the job. Those are public refusals and, in El-Sayed's case, an open preference. They are not a whip operation, and they are not a filed candidacy.\n\nFor readers trying to judge whether Tuesday changed the race, the honest answer is narrower than the social-media framing. Sanders, a nationally known independent who caucuses with the [Democratic Party](https://567politics.com/parties/united-states/democratic), has now joined the public non-endorsement column. Slotkin has set a plan test for anyone who wants her vote. Van Hollen is calling around. Schumer says he will win. The secret ballot is still weeks away.\n\n## Prediction-market prices are prices, not a count of senators\n\nBecause the tip that sent many readers to this story came from a prediction-market account, the associated contract prices are part of the record. They are not a substitute for reporting.\n\n567 Politics opened Polymarket's [\"Next Senate Majority Leader\"](https://polymarket.com/event/next-senate-majority-leader-485) event page at 3:58 p.m. Eastern on November 10, 2026, about 26 minutes after the company's alert. At that time, the page priced a \"Yes\" outcome on Chuck Schumer at 84 percent and \"No\" at 16 percent. Chris Van Hollen stood at 13 percent and Brian Schatz at 3 percent. Other listed names, including Sen. John Thune, were below 1 percent. The event showed about $744,300 in total volume and about $141,100 in 24-hour volume. It was still open. The written resolution rules on the page say the market resolves to the person announced as the next Senate majority leader after the November 3, 2026, election, remains open until January 3, 2027, and resolves to \"Other\" if no majority or leader is in place by 11:59 p.m. Eastern on June 30, 2027. The same page displayed an \"Ends: November 4, 2026\" label that does not match those written rules; the resolution text is the better guide to what the contract is supposed to do.\n\nA third-party snapshot from Prediction Ticker, taken at 6:30 a.m. Eastern on November 10, showed Schumer at 91 percent on the same event. That earlier reading is a different vendor's print at a different time of day. It is not a continuous order-book history, and it is not evidence, on the material opened for this article, that Sanders's remarks caused a seven-point drop.\n\n**Polymarket prices for next Senate majority leader, as of 3:58 p.m. Eastern on Nov. 10, 2026**\n\nThese figures are implied probabilities from trades, not forecasts, polls, or confirmed vote counts. Event volume was about $744,300. Other listed outcomes were below 1 percent. The market was still open.","textStyle":"body","layout":"text"},{"role":"htmltable","html":"
CandidateImplied probability
Chuck Schumer84%
Chris Van Hollen13%
Brian Schatz3%
","layout":"text"},{"role":"body","format":"markdown","text":"Source: [Polymarket event page](https://polymarket.com/event/next-senate-majority-leader-485)\n\nThe prices can move after publication. They should be read as what traders were willing to pay at a stated time, not as a finding that Schumer has, or lacks, 28 conference votes.\n\n## What is confirmed, and what is still unknown\n\nThe confirmed core is straightforward. Sanders said, on camera and on the record at the Capitol on Tuesday, that he will not support Schumer for Democratic leader and that \"the time is now for change.\" CBS News published a full version of the quote. A 44-second MS NOW clip of the same remarks, posted by Rupar at 3:06 p.m. Eastern, shows Sanders delivering those lines at a podium; that post is embedded above. Other outlets, including Bloomberg Government and Common Dreams, reported the same announcement. Slotkin appeared with him and described herself as a no until she sees a concrete, different plan. Van Hollen said he is calling colleagues and has not launched a campaign. Schumer has said, before and on Tuesday, that he expects to be elected majority leader.\n\nSeveral widely circulated additions are weaker. Polymarket's headline used \"Senate Majority Leader\" for a vote that, as a formal matter, chooses the Democratic leader. Aides' claims that Schumer already has a locked majority have been reported secondhand and have not been accompanied by a public list of commitments. No outlet opened for this article produced a complete, current whip count. The Associated Press and The Washington Times also covered or appeared to cover the same news, but pages retrieved on Tuesday returned Cloudflare interstitial screens rather than full article text, so those reports are not treated here as independently verified sources. A C-SPAN clip of the remarks was cited by Common Dreams; a search of C-SPAN's account on X and of C-SPAN's video library from this newsroom did not return a matching November 10, 2026, recording, so a C-SPAN original is not embedded.\n\nThe institutional calendar is clearer than the vote. Conference rules put the election no earlier than December. Reporting points to early December. Until a challenger files, or until the secret ballot is held, Tuesday's news is a high-profile defection from the incumbent, not a completed leadership change. The people who will decide the outcome are the senators and senators-elect in the Democratic Conference, not a prediction market and not a single afternoon's posts.","textStyle":"body","layout":"text"}]}