# Germany's coalition splits over first-ever cut to basic income rates as unpublished recalculation is reported

Bild am Sonntag says new figures put rates €5 to €7 too high; the Union wants them lowered, the SPD wants a freeze, and Thursday's budget deadline looms.

By 567 Politics staff · 567politics
Published: 2026-11-10T02:25:45.061115Z
Updated: 2026-11-10T02:26:15.292812Z
Canonical: https://567politics.com/news/germany-grundsicherung-rates-cut-dispute-union-spd-evs-2023-schweitzer-november-2026

Cite citation_url. Preserve source links, dates and qualifications. date_modified is an edit date, not proof that every claim was rechecked. Third-party images and quoted material retain their own rights. Resolve relative links against https://567politics.com/news/germany-grundsicherung-rates-cut-dispute-union-spd-evs-2023-schweitzer-november-2026.

Germany's coalition is fighting over whether to cut basic income support for the first time. A recalculation of the monthly rates, not yet published, reportedly shows that they are €5 to €7 higher than the new statistical method would justify for adults and children. Chancellor Friedrich Merz's CDU/CSU wants the rates lowered from 2027, according to [Bild am Sonntag](https://www.focus.de/politik/deutschland/union-und-spd-streiten-ueber-senkung-der-grundsicherung-regelsaetze-5-bis-7-euro-zu-hoch_37f991cf-e968-498d-ba5f-485c9f3fb2d7.html), while its partner, the Social Democrats (SPD), wants to keep them where they are. The labor ministry declined on Monday to comment on the report but confirmed that it is preparing the law that will reset the rates using new household spending data.

The outcome matters for about 4.9 million people, the number in the program in October according to Federal Employment Agency figures cited by Welt. A single adult in Grundsicherung, the program that replaced Bürgergeld in July, receives €563 a month, an amount unchanged since 2024. The dispute must be settled quickly, because the 2027 budget is due to be finalized at the Bundestag budget committee's last session on Thursday, November 12.

## What the reported recalculation says

The claim that the rates are too high comes from Bild am Sonntag, which cited "high-ranking coalition circles." The calculation has not been published, so its method and figures cannot be checked. According to the report, a draft law prepared under former Labor Minister Bärbel Bas (SPD) would have kept the current amounts to protect recipients' existing entitlements. Merz rejected that approach, Bild reported, and the Union is pushing for the lower amounts. The new labor minister, [Alexander Schweitzer](/politicians/alexander-schweitzer), who took over from Bas, now has to settle the issue with the Chancellery, according to the paper. Quotations below are translated from German.

At the government's regular press conference on Monday, a labor ministry spokesman, Ehrentraut, said he could not comment on the weekend's reporting. "It is correct, however, that we are currently preparing the legislative procedure for the new determination of the standard needs and that this is being coordinated," he said, according to the [FragDenStaat transcript](https://fragdenstaat.de/pressekonferenzen/regierungspressekonferenz-vom-09-11-2026/). He confirmed the ministry is using the 2023 income and consumption sample (EVS). Asked whether rates could fall, he said the details were still being coordinated and asked for "a little patience." The ministry is aiming for "timely" cabinet consideration, he said, and he declined to say whether the dispute over protecting existing rates was holding up agreement.

## Why the rates could fall now when they have not before

Germany sets its basic income rates in two different ways, and the difference explains why a cut is suddenly possible.

In most years, the rates are updated each January using a formula that combines prices and net wages. If that formula produces a lower number, the law keeps the old amount. [Section 28a(5) of Book XII of the Social Code](https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/sgb_12/__28a.html) says that if the update yields lower amounts, the previous year's amounts "continue to apply until a subsequent update produces higher amounts." That is what happened for 2026. The labor ministry's [own explanation](https://www.bmas.de/DE/Soziales/Sozialhilfe/Methodik-der-Regelbedarfsermittlung-FAQ/faq-sozialhilfe-regelbedarfsermittlung.html) says the formula produced €557 for a single adult, less than the €563 being paid, so the rate stayed at €563 because of what it calls the "legal protection of existing entitlements."

Roughly every five years, however, the rates are recalculated from scratch after the Federal Statistical Office publishes a new EVS, which records what lower-income households actually spend. The ministry says the legislature is obliged to set new rates by law when a new EVS is available. The results of the 2023 survey were published on December 9, 2025, and the ministry says its goal is for the new rates to take effect in 2027. The protection in Section 28a applies to the annual update, not to this full recalculation. A [tagesschau analysis](https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/innenpolitik/neue-regelsaetze-grundsicherung-100.html) in July called the recalculation a kind of "zero hour" in which lawmakers decide which spending items count toward the minimum.

The recalculation involves political choices. Statisticians record spending by low-income households, and then the law excludes items it treats as not essential, such as alcohol, tobacco, cut flowers and pets. Adding or removing items changes the result.

### Current rates

The table shows the monthly rates that have applied since January 2024, according to the labor ministry and a [data table compiled by the University of Duisburg-Essen's sozialpolitik-aktuell service](https://www.sozialpolitik-aktuell.de/files/sozialpolitik-aktuell/_Politikfelder/Sozialstaat/Datensammlung/PDF-Dateien/tabIII16.pdf). Some news reports gave €451 as the rate for teenagers; the official figure for ages 14 to 17 is €471, while €451 applies to adults living in residential facilities.

| Group | Rate level | Euros a month |
| --- | --- | ---: |
| Single adult or single parent | 1 | 563 |
| Each adult partner | 2 | 506 |
| Adult in a residential facility | 3 | 451 |
| Teenager aged 14 to 17 | 4 | 471 |
| Child aged 6 to 13 | 5 | 390 |
| Child under 6 | 6 | 357 |

Housing and heating costs are paid separately. A cut of €5 to €7 would equal roughly 1% of the single-adult rate.

### How the single-adult rate has moved

The rate rose every year from 2011 to 2024, with the largest increases in 2023 and 2024, after a second, price-based step was added to the update formula from 2023 during a period of high inflation. It has not changed since, because the formula has produced lower figures and the protection rule has held the rate at €563. Over the whole period, the single-adult rate rose by €199, or about 55%. The upday news service and Apollo News, citing the reporting, said the rates have never been lowered since the Hartz IV reforms took effect in 2005.

```chart
type: line
title: Monthly basic income rate for a single adult in Germany, 2011–2026
source: [sozialpolitik-aktuell.de, University of Duisburg-Essen (Regelbedarfsstufe 1)](https://www.sozialpolitik-aktuell.de/files/sozialpolitik-aktuell/_Politikfelder/Sozialstaat/Datensammlung/PDF-Dateien/tabIII16.pdf)
prefix: €
note: Rate level 1, set each January 1. Excludes housing and heating costs.
---
Year | Euros a month
2011 | 364
2012 | 374
2013 | 382
2014 | 391
2015 | 399
2016 | 404
2017 | 409
2018 | 416
2019 | 424
2020 | 432
2021 | 446
2022 | 449
2023 | 502
2024 | 563
2025 | 563
2026 | 563
```

## The coalition's positions

### The case for lowering the rates

Bild reported that the Union's argument is that paying more than the new calculation justifies would be unfair to working people who fund the benefit through their taxes. Wolfgang Steiger, secretary general of the [CDU](/parties/germany/cdu)-affiliated business association Wirtschaftsrat, told [Bild](https://www.bild.de/politik/inland/cdu-wirtschaftsrat-fordert-spd-zu-buergergeld-kuerzungen-auf-6af073ea1125adfe9365c93c) on Monday: "Many employees feel it is unfair how small the gap between wages and benefits is in our country." He called a cut "the consistent and correct step" and said it would give the SPD a chance to show "that it also does something for employees and is not just a party of benefit recipients." The Wirtschaftsrat is an association close to the CDU, not a party body.

Some Union leaders had already argued in this direction. Earlier this summer, CSU leader [Markus Söder](/politicians/markus-soder) told Bild that the rates "must be reduced to the absolute constitutional minimum," according to tagesschau. Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt (CSU) had also called the old Bürgergeld rates too high. Not everyone in the Union put the emphasis on the rates. CDU welfare specialist Kai Whittaker told tagesschau in July: "You don't fix the welfare state with a red pen on the standard rate, but by opening the door back into the labor market for people."

### The case for keeping them

The [SPD](/parties/germany/spd) wants to freeze the rates at current levels. Jan Dieren, the group's deputy spokesman for labor and social affairs, told Bild am Sonntag that a first-ever cut would be "completely irresponsible." "People in basic income support already have to turn every euro over twice. We must not destroy their trust that the rates will at least not fall," he said. "More than half of parents in basic income support already regularly go without food so that their children can eat their fill. Even a small reduction in the rates means more days with a growling stomach for them." The source of his figure on parents was not given in the report.

### The case for raising them

The [Greens](/parties/germany/greens) and welfare organizations argue that the current rates are already too low. Greens welfare spokesman Timon Dzienus called plans to cut "the already far too low rates" "shabby" in July. "A 13-year-old child has only €5.02 a day for food and drink in the standard rate," he told tagesschau. Joachim Rock, head of the Paritätischer welfare association, said the rate for a single adult would need to rise to more than €800 a month to protect against poverty. "Whoever cuts the subsistence minimum increases and deepens poverty, and provokes mass objections and lawsuits," he said. The association's calculation uses a different method from the government's.

### The legal question

In a [2010 ruling](https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/DE/2010/bvg10-005.html) on the Hartz IV rates, Germany's Constitutional Court held that lawmakers must measure all expenses necessary for a dignified subsistence minimum "in a transparent and appropriate procedure according to actual need." That standard is why the choice of spending items, not only the totals, is likely to be challenged. The tagesschau analysis said that whatever items were removed to lower the rates, constitutional complaints would be "practically guaranteed," and failure in court could not be ruled out. Rough estimates show the budget stakes: tagesschau calculated that cutting €10 from the rate would save a sum in the mid hundreds of millions of euros. The 2027 draft budget includes €50.8 billion for basic income support for jobseekers, [Welt](https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article6af17583a389bc337cfcac3b/sozialleitungen-regelsaetze-fuer-grundsicherung-sollen-zu-hoch-sein-unveroeffentlichte-studie.html) reported.

## A second fight: the €25 child supplement

The coalition is also divided over a monthly €25 supplement for children in low-income families, introduced during the inflation spike. The government agreed to end it from January, Welt reported, saving about €450 million and affecting about 1.5 million children. Bas proposed instead a €25 monthly education supplement for schoolchildren in basic income support, but the Union rejected a new benefit, according to Bild am Sonntag. The SPD group is now trying to keep the supplement for all children who receive it. "That is €25 a month that means a damn lot to children in poverty," Dieren said. "Taking it away from them would always be wrong. In these times especially."

## Thursday's deadline

Both questions affect the 2027 budget. A finance ministry spokesperson confirmed on Monday that the budget committee's final session is on November 12 and said the government was still discussing several points. The rate dispute is one of several open issues, alongside the planned plastic packaging tax and sugar tax described in [our report on the budget talks](/news/germany-plastic-packaging-tax-frei-miersch-schneider-2027-budget-clean-up-session-november-2026), and Merz's push for a broader [electricity tax cut](/news/germany-merz-electricity-tax-cut-priority-2027-budget-november-2026).

Even if the coalition agrees on numbers this week, the new rates still require a law passed by parliament. If the recalculation law is not in force in time, tagesschau reported, the current rates would be carried forward, and the German Economic Institute (IW) expected another zero increase, keeping the single-adult rate at €563. It remains unknown what the unpublished calculation contains, which spending items it counts, and whether Schweitzer and the Chancellery will agree to a cut, a freeze or a smaller change. The chancellor's record on welfare policy is summarized on the [Friedrich Merz](/politicians/friedrich-merz) profile.