{"version":"1.9","identifier":"37ffc1bd-a918-492f-b36a-c928c12cecf4","language":"en-US","title":"Japan weighs ¥70–80 trillion defense plan, nearly double its current budget","layout":{"columns":7,"width":1024,"margin":32,"gutter":20},"componentLayouts":{"text":{"columnStart":0,"columnSpan":7,"maximumContentWidth":720,"margin":{"top":12,"bottom":12}},"photo":{"columnStart":0,"columnSpan":7,"margin":{"top":20,"bottom":20}}},"componentTextStyles":{"default":{"fontName":"HelveticaNeue","fontSize":18,"lineHeight":29,"textColor":"#171717"},"headline":{"fontName":"HelveticaNeue-Bold","fontSize":36,"lineHeight":42,"conditional":[{"conditions":{"maxViewportWidth":480},"fontSize":28,"lineHeight":34}]},"intro":{"fontName":"HelveticaNeue","fontSize":20,"lineHeight":28,"textColor":"#555555"},"caption":{"fontName":"HelveticaNeue","fontSize":13,"lineHeight":19,"textColor":"#666666"},"byline":{"fontName":"HelveticaNeue","fontSize":13,"lineHeight":20,"textColor":"#666666"},"body":{"fontName":"HelveticaNeue","fontSize":18,"lineHeight":29,"paragraphSpacingAfter":14,"linkStyle":{"textColor":"#00704a"}}},"metadata":{"canonicalURL":"https://567politics.com/news/japan-defense-spending-five-year-plan-takaichi-november-2026","datePublished":"2026-11-03T00:15:52.479928Z","dateModified":"2026-11-03T00:16:47.072228Z","authors":["567 Politics staff"],"excerpt":"Reuters says Takaichi's government is considering 1.8 times the current five-year plan. Opposition parties question the scale and the taxes to pay for it.","thumbnailURL":"https://pub-fac99da959e344fe99d810d309cef7df.r2.dev/photos/article/37ffc1bd-a918-492f-b36a-c928c12cecf4/24abd7bd180271e5589ea88e472457cb.jpg","keywords":["jp"],"generatorName":"Frog News","generatorVersion":"1.0"},"components":[{"role":"title","text":"Japan weighs ¥70–80 trillion defense plan, nearly double its current budget","textStyle":"headline","layout":"text"},{"role":"intro","text":"Reuters says Takaichi's government is considering 1.8 times the current five-year plan. Opposition parties question the scale and the taxes to pay for it.","textStyle":"intro","layout":"text"},{"role":"byline","text":"By 567 Politics staff · Published November 3, 2026","textStyle":"byline","layout":"text"},{"role":"photo","URL":"https://pub-fac99da959e344fe99d810d309cef7df.r2.dev/photos/article/37ffc1bd-a918-492f-b36a-c928c12cecf4/24abd7bd180271e5589ea88e472457cb.jpg","caption":"The gate of Japan's Ministry of Defense in Ichigaya, Tokyo, in 2020. · Voice of America via Wikimedia Commons, public domain","accessibilityCaption":"The gate of Japan's Ministry of Defense in Ichigaya, Tokyo, in 2020.","layout":"photo"},{"role":"caption","text":"The gate of Japan's Ministry of Defense in Ichigaya, Tokyo, in 2020. · Voice of America via Wikimedia Commons, public domain","textStyle":"caption","layout":"text"},{"role":"body","format":"markdown","text":"Japan's government and ruling coalition are considering a five-year defense budget of ¥70 trillion to ¥80 trillion ($457 billion to $508 billion). Reuters reported the plan on Monday, November 2, citing two people familiar with the matter. That would be about 1.8 times the roughly ¥43 trillion in the current plan, which began in fiscal 2023.\n\nThe proposal would cover the five years from April 2027. It is part of Prime Minister [Sanae Takaichi](https://567politics.com/politicians/sanae-takaichi)'s plan to rewrite Japan's three main security documents by the end of the year. The figure has not been announced by the government. Reuters said it could still change as the budget is compiled. Japan's Defense Ministry said it had no comment.\n\nThis article explains what is under discussion, how it compares with past plans, how the government proposes to pay for it, and how opposition parties and China have responded.\n\n## What the reported plan includes\n\nAccording to the [Reuters report](https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/11/02/japan/politics/defense-spending-double-takaichi/) carried by The Japan Times, one source said the new money is expected to fund purchases such as \"large numbers of drones.\" The same source said a weaker yen has raised the cost of buying defense equipment from abroad.\n\nThe second source said the final total could land \"in the mid-to-late ¥70 trillion range.\" That person also questioned whether such a sum would be enough \"given the security environment in East Asia.\" The source said the final figure was still being debated between the government and its coalition partners. A Japanese-language version of the Reuters report, [published on Yahoo News Japan](https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/1c2680cc4d1aae09c4c1f5a09a1fb79b67c71caf), quoted the same person on next steps. The person said the government and ruling parties would need to discuss the total before year-end, with further increases in view. (Our translation.)\n\nKyodo News had reported a similar range in October, citing unnamed officials, according to [Bloomberg in The Japan Times](https://www.japantimes.co.jp/business/2026/10/20/economy/japan-katayama-defense-spending/).\n\nThe plan sits inside a wider rewrite. In her October 5 policy speech to the Diet, Takaichi said Japan's security environment \"is changing at an accelerating pace and becoming increasingly complex and severe.\" She said: \"To fundamentally reinforce our defense capabilities, we will review the Three Strategic Documents by the end of 2026,\" according to the [Prime Minister's Office translation](https://japan.kantei.go.jp/105/speech/202610/05shoshinhyomei.html). The three documents are the National Security Strategy, the National Defense Strategy and the Defense Buildup Program. The five-year spending total is set in the last of these.\n\n## How the proposal compares with earlier plans\n\nThe current program was adopted at the end of 2022 under former Prime Minister Fumio Kishida. It raised planned spending sharply from the ¥27.5 trillion level of the previous plan, Reuters reported. It focused on long-range missiles for counterstrike capability, as well as ammunition and spare parts.\n\n**Japan's five-year defense buildup plans, trillion yen**\n\nThe two bars on the right show the low and high ends of the range under discussion. The government has not adopted a figure. The earlier plan total is the initial allocation Reuters cites for the plan before fiscal 2023.","textStyle":"body","layout":"text"},{"role":"htmltable","html":"<table><tr><th>Plan</th><th>Total</th></tr><tr><td>Earlier plan</td><td>27.5tn yen</td></tr><tr><td>FY2023-27 plan</td><td>43tn yen</td></tr><tr><td>Proposal, low end</td><td>70tn yen</td></tr><tr><td>Proposal, high end</td><td>80tn yen</td></tr></table>","layout":"text"},{"role":"body","format":"markdown","text":"Source: [Reuters via The Japan Times, Nov. 2, 2026](https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/11/02/japan/politics/defense-spending-double-takaichi/)\n\nThe government brought defense spending to 1.9 percent of gross domestic product last fiscal year, or roughly ¥11 trillion, Bloomberg reported. That figure counts some wider security outlays, such as spending on the coast guard. Bloomberg also said Japan has been considering eventually raising defense spending to 3.5 percent of GDP, in line with a target adopted by NATO and other U.S. allies.\n\nAnnual budgets are already rising. The Defense Ministry asked for a record of roughly ¥8.9 trillion for fiscal 2027, [The Diplomat reported](https://thediplomat.com/2026/08/japans-record-2027-defense-budget-request-is-only-the-opening-bid/) in August. The ministry left about 160 items without a set amount, pending the review of the security documents. The Diplomat said the figure should be seen \"less as a final price tag than as an opening bid.\"\n\nSeveral points about the numbers are not settled. Reuters did not say how much of the range covers equipment, personnel or broader security spending. It is also not yet clear whether the new plan would formally replace the last year of the current one, which runs through fiscal 2027. We will update this article when the government publishes its figures.\n\n## The financing question\n\nA plan of this size would add pressure to a budget that already carries other costly policies.\n\nFinance Minister [Satsuki Katayama](https://567politics.com/politicians/satsuki-katayama) said on October 20 that ministries were \"building up realistic and concrete discussions on the specifics of our defense capabilities and the level of defense spending needed to achieve them.\" She added: \"As for how to finance this, we will consider the necessary measures, giving due consideration to fiscal sustainability, ensuring stable sources of funding.\" Her remarks followed Kyodo reports that a further corporate tax increase had emerged as a possible funding source. She also said decisions on defense spending would be based entirely on Japan's own judgment.\n\nTakaichi's government passed a record ¥122.3 trillion budget for the year to March 2027 and later added a ¥3.1 trillion supplementary package, [The Straits Times reported](https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/japan-casts-military-buildup-as-path-to-economic-prosperity) in August, citing Reuters. It said Takaichi \"has yet to explain clearly\" how she would pay for a further expansion. Her government is also pursuing a two-year cut to the consumption tax on food, which [567 Politics covered last month](https://567politics.com/news/japan-consumption-tax-cut-bill-diet-takaichi-october-2026).\n\nIn her policy speech, Takaichi described her approach as \"responsible and proactive public finances.\" She said the government would \"ensure fiscal sustainability even as we increase people's take-home pay.\" She said reducing the debt-to-GDP ratio steadily was \"a core priority.\"\n\nTaxes are politically sensitive. Kishida faced a public backlash after he decided in 2022 to fund part of the last buildup with tax increases, Bloomberg reported. An income tax increase in that package was postponed several times and is due to take effect next year.\n\n## What the opposition says\n\nJapan's opposition parties do not share one position. Some accept the need for a stronger military but question its size and funding. Others oppose the buildup outright.\n\n**Tax and scale.** In December 2025, [Yoshihiko Noda](https://567politics.com/politicians/yoshihiko-noda), then leader of the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan (CDP), opposed the planned income tax increase for defense. He said more than ¥100 billion of the defense budget had gone unspent in each of 2023 and 2024. \"Raising taxes when the size comes first is wrong,\" he said, according to [Jiji Press](https://www.jiji.com/jc/article?k=2025120500830\\&g=pol). (567 Politics translated this quote from Japanese.)\n\nIn October 2025, CDP policy chief Tomofumi Honjo said many points about the ¥43 trillion plan were still unclear and its financing was not settled. He said it was a leap of a step or two to talk about bringing spending forward or adding more, according to a [CDP statement](https://cdp-japan.jp/news/20251029_9801). (Our translation.)\n\nOn March 26, 2026, the CDP, the Centrist Reform Alliance and Komeito agreed a joint line on defense taxes. The three parties accepted the need to strengthen defense capabilities, according to a [CDP summary of the meeting](https://cdp-japan.jp/news/20260326_0169). But they said an income tax increase was inappropriate while prices are high. They said tobacco and corporate taxes could raise more than ¥1 trillion, and called for the income tax increase to be frozen. (Our translation.)\n\n**Opposition to the buildup.** Taku Yamazoe, policy chief of the Japanese Communist Party, spoke in December 2025. He said the tax plan was \"a step toward a full-scale tax increase for military expansion,\" and that his party was \"firmly opposed,\" Jiji reported. (Our translation.)\n\n**Wait and see.** Kazuya Shinba, secretary-general of the Democratic Party for the People, said only that his party wanted \"a proper discussion\" of how to pay for the buildup, according to Jiji. (Our translation.)\n\nThese parties' reactions to Monday's reported figure were not yet available when this article was published. The quotes above are from earlier debates over the current plan and its taxes.\n\n## How China has responded\n\nJapan's defense white paper describes China's military activities as Japan's \"greatest strategic challenge.\" China has criticized the buildup for months. In August, a Chinese Defense Ministry spokesperson said that white paper was \"filled with false narratives,\" The Straits Times reported.\n\nOn October 30, defense spokesman Zhang Xiaogang spoke about Japan's expanding deployments and military cooperation. He said they show \"that Japan is accelerating its remilitarization and is becoming a real threat to regional security,\" according to [China Daily](https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202610/30/WS6ae3eb75e4b06d4aa0565f9c.html), a state-owned newspaper. He was responding to the U.S.-Japan \"Keen Sword 27\" exercise.\n\nIn September, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said China and other \"peace-loving countries will resolutely curb Japan's neo-militarism growth,\" according to the state-run [Global Times](https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202609/1369742.shtml). He was responding to the white paper and the fiscal 2027 budget request.\n\nRelations worsened after Takaichi said in November 2025 that Japan could deploy its Self-Defense Forces if a Chinese attack on Taiwan also threatened Japan's survival, the Straits Times reported. Beijing demanded that she retract the remark. Takaichi has said that \"peace is not something that can be achieved simply by wishing for it,\" and that her government will pursue diplomacy \"while steadily reinforcing our defense capabilities.\" Japan's white paper argues that investment in defense benefits the wider economy and people's lives, according to a Defense Ministry presentation cited by Reuters.\n\n## Arguments for and against a larger plan\n\n**For a larger plan.** The government says Japan's security environment is growing more severe. Its white paper names China, Russia and North Korea as the main threats, according to The Straits Times. Officials told Reuters in September that Japan is exploring a defense built around drones to intercept long-range attacks, reflecting fighting seen in Ukraine and Iran. One source told Reuters that a weaker yen has raised the cost of equipment. Another said even the mid-to-late ¥70 trillion range might not be enough.\n\n**For more scrutiny.** The CDP and its partners accept that defense needs strengthening but say the size should not come before the plan's uses are defined. They point to unspent funds and unsettled financing. They also say an income tax increase is wrong while prices are high.\n\n**Against the buildup.** The Communist Party opposes what it calls a tax increase for military expansion. China calls Japan's course \"remilitarization\" and a threat to the region. Takaichi's government says it will keep pursuing diplomacy alongside its defense buildup.\n\n**On funding.** Katayama has stressed \"stable sources of funding\" and fiscal sustainability. How the plan is paid for may prove as contested as its size.\n\n## The timetable for a decision\n\nThe government plans to publish the three revised security documents and the new buildup program by the end of 2026. The final five-year total and Japan's fiscal 2027 defense budget are expected at the same time, alongside decisions on tax measures.\n\nCoalition partners will need to agree on the total and on how to pay for it. Opposition parties will have chances to question the plan when the Diet debates the fiscal 2027 budget.\n\nFor background on Japan's defense policy, see the defense section of 567 Politics' [Japan issues page](https://567politics.com/issues/japan#jp-defence). Our earlier coverage includes [German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's visit with Takaichi](https://567politics.com/news/merz-takaichi-japan-germany-trade-alliance-october-2026) in October.\n\n## About this article\n\nThis article is based on Reuters reporting carried by The Japan Times, the Jakarta Post and Yahoo News Japan. We also used the Prime Minister's Office, Bloomberg, The Straits Times, The Diplomat, Jiji Press, CDP statements and Chinese state media. The spending range comes from unnamed sources and has not been confirmed by the government. Japanese-language quotes were translated by 567 Politics. We did not review political funding reports for the Japanese politicians named here; Japan publishes such reports under its Political Funds Control Act, but none bear directly on this story. Our database of U.S. government datasets does not cover Japanese fiscal data. Read how we handle sources in our [editorial standards](https://567politics.com/editorial-standards) and [methodology](https://567politics.com/methodology).","textStyle":"body","layout":"text"}]}