Forum for Democracy

Forum for Democracy is included for its emphasis on private enterprise and market-oriented policy and traditional institutions and cultural continuity.

Reviewed 2026-11-05 · Editorial profile

Political position

The economic estimate interprets priorities around private enterprise and market-oriented policy; the social estimate interprets traditional institutions and cultural continuity. These are broad editorial judgments about the program, not survey measurements or every member’s views.

Economic estimate: Broadly right · +3 / −5 to +5
Social estimate: Strongly traditional · +5 / −5 to +5

Initial platform-based editorial estimate. Broad party traditions and the linked policy material do not resolve every issue; small differences are inconclusive. This record does not assert current coalition membership, parliamentary status or vote share.

Evidence: Undated party material accessed 2026-11-05; linked documents can predate this review.. Review date: 2026-11-05. Coordinates are 567politics interpretations; the sources do not necessarily publish or endorse them.

Country context

Multiparty parliamentary electoral system; coalition labels and constituent organizations are separate.

Selected nationally significant organizations and contrasting policy traditions. This is not an exhaustive register or a current seat/coalition chart. Profiles without independently supported positions remain unplotted. Progressief Nederland (PRO) replaces the former GroenLinks/PvdA party labels following the 2026 merger. Its new-party placement remains unestablished pending a full policy review.

Sources & evidence

Forum for Democracy · published party material ↗
Undated party material accessed 2026-11-05; linked documents can predate this review. Party-authored material is advocacy, not independent verification.

Party programs describe the organization’s own position; country research supplies independent context. Neither is an endorsement. Read the placement methodology.