Skip to content
567politics.

Israel

Israel's army chief reportedly balks again at Netanyahu's Iran plans as Washington cools on war

Channel 12 says IDF chief Eyal Zamir opposes unspecified Iran steps sought by the caretaker prime minister. Netanyahu's office calls it fake news; Rubio says major combat is not needed now.

By 567 Politics staffPublished 9 min read

Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, now the IDF chief of staff, in a 2022 Israel Ministry of Defense photo.
Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, now the IDF chief of staff, in a 2022 Israel Ministry of Defense photo. · Photo: Israel Ministry of Defense, via Wikimedia Commons (CC0 1.0) ↗

Israel's top general has again pushed back against steps on Iran that caretaker Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wants to take, Channel 12 reported on Tuesday, according to the Times of Israel. The report says Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, the chief of staff of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), sees the actions as incautious for now. It cites political uncertainty in Israel and what it calls a fading appetite for war in Washington. Netanyahu's office called the story "biased fake news." The report did not say what the actions are.

The dispute matters because of timing. Netanyahu leads a caretaker government. He lost his majority in the Oct. 27 election, and rival Gadi Eisenkot now holds the mandate to try to form a government. At the same time, the United States says it sees no need for new major combat against Iran. A Financial Times report, summarized by Anadolu Agency, says Netanyahu has been calling President Donald Trump "every day" to urge a return to war. So the question is who sets Israel's Iran policy in the weeks before a new government, and how much room an outgoing prime minister has to act.

What Channel 12 reported#

The Channel 12 story ran on Tuesday evening and cited several unnamed sources. According to the Israel.com newsroom's account of the broadcast, correspondent Yaron Avraham said friction had resumed between Zamir and the political leadership over Israel's options on Iran. In that account, Zamir believes the measures could drag Israel into a clash with Iran at a moment that calls for restraint. Avraham also said it is unclear which government will take office or how long the caretaker period will last.

Neither outlet described the measures. The Times of Israel said the actions were "unspecified." Israel.com said neither report explained what Netanyahu has proposed. That gap is important. What can be confirmed is narrow: a senior officer reportedly objects, the prime minister's office denies the account, and the substance is not public.

Netanyahu's office answered in two parts. It called the report "biased fake news," in the Times of Israel's rendering; Israel.com, citing Channel 12's site, translated the phrase as "tendentious fake news." It added: "We don't comment on what was said in closed security deliberations." The Times of Israel's report did not include an IDF account of the meetings.

A repeat of the pre-election clash#

This is the second reported standoff in about two weeks. Two days before the Oct. 27 vote, Channel 12 reported an "unprecedented confrontation" over an order by Netanyahu for military action that defense officials feared could lead to a flare-up with Iran, the Times of Israel recalled. That report said Zamir asked for more deliberations and for signed legal authorization.

On Oct. 26, Channels 12 and 13 reported that Zamir was the only security chief who opposed the action. The Times of Israel's report on that day said Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz sought it. The New York Times reported the same day that Netanyahu "sought for weeks to orchestrate a new airstrike on Iran" but was blocked by Zamir, according to the Times of Israel's summary. The New York Times also said Zamir worried about "a separate action against Iran, short of an overt strike."

Netanyahu's side rejected that framing at the time. His office said he "clarified in real time that an attack before the Israeli elections was not on the agenda." Netanyahu said "there was no fight" between him and Zamir.

Reported Netanyahu-Zamir disputes over Iran, Oct.-Nov. 2026
  1. Channel 12 reports a confrontation over an unspecified military action
  2. Channels 12 and 13 report Zamir was the only security chief opposed
  3. Israel votes; Netanyahu's bloc wins 53 of 120 seats
  4. President Herzog gives Gadi Eisenkot the mandate
  5. Financial Times reports Netanyahu calls Trump daily on Iran
  6. Rubio says there is no need for major combat operations
  7. Channel 12 reports Zamir again opposes Netanyahu's proposed steps

Source: Times of Israel, Anadolu Agency

Netanyahu's case on Iran#

Netanyahu has stated his goal in public. In his speech after the new Knesset was sworn in on Tuesday, he said Iran is rebuilding its nuclear program. "Iran is working to revive the nuclear threat. The only way to permanently eliminate this existential threat is to overthrow the ayatollahs' regime," he said, according to the Times of Israel's translation.

He used that threat to argue for a national unity government. "In the face of these threats, we must do one thing in this house: put aside every other consideration and establish a national unity government," he said. Most of the speech then attacked the Arab-led parties, as 567 Politics reported earlier. Eisenkot's party later canceled talks with Likud, which 567 Politics also covered.

Netanyahu's view that Iran remains a threat has some support in Washington. Trump himself said Iran is still "the bully of the Middle East a little bit" when asked why U.S. forces remain in the region. That remark is quoted in the Times of Israel's report on Zamir.

Washington says economic pressure is enough for now#

The U.S. position has moved the other way. Speaking in Paris after a meeting of Group of Seven foreign ministers on Tuesday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the U.S. blockade and sanctions are hurting Iran badly. "The President really doesn't have any need to conduct major combat operations," he said, according to the State Department transcript as distributed by Public. He added that the U.S. military "stands ready" if Iran "crosses certain red lines."

Trump said on Monday that there is "positive momentum" toward ending the war, and that new strikes now seem "quite unlikely," the Financial Times report summarized by Anadolu noted. He wrote that "Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait and others would prefer the status quo." The FT said the leaders of Turkey, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar had all urged Trump to give diplomacy more time.

The U.S. ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, was asked about the FT report on Kan public radio. "I am not aware that is true. I have not heard that," he said, according to the Times of Israel. He said strikes remain on the table because "the president says it is."

The FT's sourcing is limited. Its main claim comes from "a person briefed on the discussions." A second person familiar with Israel's view told the paper that Netanyahu wants military action to resume but that there was no current "push" to persuade Trump. White House officials told Axios that Netanyahu urged Trump to strike Iran right after the U.S. midterm results, according to the Hindustan Times. U.S. officials told Axios that a call between the two leaders last week was "frank," the paper added.

Iran says there are no talks#

Tehran disputes Washington's description of diplomacy. Mohsen Rezaei, the head of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, said the United States should "stop manufacturing fake news about imaginary talks" and that it is "time to surrender to the seven conditions Iran has repeatedly set out," the Times of Israel's live blog reported. He told the Al-Mayadeen network that no negotiations are under way. Iran wants a "clear and explicit" U.S. answer to seven conditions it set out in a June interim deal before the Strait of Hormuz reopens, according to the same report.

That stance cuts two ways in Israel's debate. It supports Netanyahu's view that diplomacy is not producing results. It also supports the view that new Israeli action could set off a wider Iranian response at a time when Gulf states are pressing for calm.

The Knesset wants oversight#

The new Knesset majority wants a say. Avigdor Liberman, the Yisrael Beytenu leader who is set to chair the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, told reporters on Tuesday that he will summon Zamir, Mossad chief Roman Gofman and Shin Bet chief David Zini. The Times of Israel live blog reported that he plans to ask about "efforts to carry out actions" against Iran, a reference to the reported pre-election operation. "There is no effective [parliamentary] oversight of the security establishment," he said.

Liberman is a former defense minister. His concern, as stated, is about process and oversight rather than opposition to pressure on Tehran. He also plans to ask Zini about the Shin Bet's election-interference probe, which the attorney general has said has found nothing that would change the result.

Committee posts are not yet formal. The anti-Netanyahu bloc agreed on the chairs on Tuesday and planned to bring the committee makeup to the Knesset for approval this week, 567 Politics reported.

How long the caretaker period could last#

The timetable is long. Under Basic Law: The Government, a candidate gets 28 days to form a coalition, with up to 14 more. For Eisenkot, who received the mandate on Nov. 8, that points to early or late December. If he fails, Netanyahu or another candidate could get a turn, and a new election is possible. Netanyahu could therefore remain caretaker prime minister for months, as 567 Politics' coalition timetable explains.

Herzog addressed the security debate in his speech to the Knesset. He said "Iran's evil empire does not stop even for a moment," and urged lawmakers to "fortify the alliance with our greatest friend – the United States," the Times of Israel reported. That call for close coordination with Washington, at a time when Washington prefers economic pressure, sits at the center of the reported dispute.

Where Israelis stand#

Public opinion on new strikes is mixed. Polls earlier this year found most Israelis backed the Iran war when it began, but a later poll found division over new strikes, as 567 Politics reported in September. No representative poll since the election has asked about the specific steps in the Channel 12 report, because those steps have not been made public.

What is known and what is not#

Known: Channel 12 reported renewed objections by Zamir. Netanyahu's office denied the account without detail. Netanyahu has said in public that only regime change in Tehran can remove the threat. The U.S. secretary of state says major combat is not needed now. Liberman plans to question the security chiefs.

Not known: what Netanyahu has proposed, whether it involves a strike or a covert step, whether other security chiefs share Zamir's view this time, and whether the FT's account of daily calls is accurate. No official on the record has confirmed the substance of the Channel 12 report. The Times of Israel and Israel.com both relied on Channel 12's unnamed sources.

The next test comes when the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee meets under Liberman, and when the Knesset votes on Nov. 17 on Speaker Amir Ohana's replacement. Both votes will show how much control the new majority can exert over a caretaker government.

Differing perspectives

Should Israel's caretaker government take new action against Iran now, or rely on U.S. economic pressure?

Each position is summarized as its supporters make it, with equal weight and in alphabetical order. A summary is not an endorsement; the evidence for each is weighed in the story above.

  • Let the blockade and sanctions work

    Who holds it: U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the Trump administration

    Rubio says the U.S. blockade and economic sanctions are already doing heavy damage to Iran, so there is no need for major combat operations now. The administration says it still wants a deal and that the military stands ready if Iran crosses certain red lines. President Trump has said new strikes look unlikely because of positive momentum, and Gulf partners have urged more time for diplomacy.

    In their words: U.S. Department of State transcript (via Public) ↗

  • Press Iran now, aim at the regime

    Who holds it: Caretaker Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Likud

    Netanyahu says Israel removed the immediate nuclear danger in the war but that Iran is now working to rebuild its nuclear program. In his view, the threat to Israel is existential and cannot be managed for long. He told the Knesset that the only way to remove it permanently is to topple the regime of the ayatollahs, and that a broad unity government is needed to meet a challenge of that size.

    In their words: The Times of Israel (Netanyahu's Knesset speech) ↗

  • Put security decisions under Knesset oversight

    Who holds it: Avigdor Liberman, Yisrael Beytenu leader and incoming Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee chair

    Liberman says there is no effective parliamentary oversight of the security establishment. He plans to summon the IDF chief of staff, the Mossad director and the Shin Bet director to explain reported efforts to carry out actions against Iran before the election. His case is that major security moves by an outgoing government should face scrutiny from the new Knesset, whatever one's view of Iran policy.

    In their words: The Times of Israel live blog (Liberman remarks) ↗

Cite this article

567 Politics staff. “Israel's army chief reportedly balks again at Netanyahu's Iran plans as Washington cools on war.” 567politics. Published 2026-11-11. https://567politics.com/news/israel-zamir-netanyahu-iran-action-channel-12-rubio-liberman-oversight-november-2026

Wikipedia citation
{{cite news |title=Israel's army chief reportedly balks again at Netanyahu's Iran plans as Washington cools on war |url=https://567politics.com/news/israel-zamir-netanyahu-iran-action-channel-12-rubio-liberman-oversight-november-2026 |work=567politics |author=567 Politics staff |date=2026-11-11 |language=en}}
CSL-JSON for reference managers
{
  "id": "https://567politics.com/news/israel-zamir-netanyahu-iran-action-channel-12-rubio-liberman-oversight-november-2026",
  "type": "article-newspaper",
  "title": "Israel's army chief reportedly balks again at Netanyahu's Iran plans as Washington cools on war",
  "URL": "https://567politics.com/news/israel-zamir-netanyahu-iran-action-channel-12-rubio-liberman-oversight-november-2026",
  "container-title": "567politics",
  "language": "en",
  "author": [
    {
      "literal": "567 Politics staff"
    }
  ],
  "issued": {
    "date-parts": [
      [
        2026,
        11,
        11
      ]
    ]
  }
}

Citations identify this article and its publication date. Assess the reporting and its linked sources before using it as evidence.

Read this article as Markdown or JSON. Cite the original page and retain its sources, dates and qualifications.

Embed this article summary

Paste this HTML into your page. The summary stays linked to the full story and updates with it. No account required.

<iframe src="https://567politics.com/embed/news/israel-zamir-netanyahu-iran-action-channel-12-rubio-liberman-oversight-november-2026?theme=auto" title="Israel's army chief reportedly balks again at Netanyahu's Iran plans as Washington cools on war by 567politics" width="100%" height="440" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:14px">Israel's army chief reportedly balks again at Netanyahu's Iran plans as Washington cools on war by <a href="https://567politics.com/news/israel-zamir-netanyahu-iran-action-channel-12-rubio-liberman-oversight-november-2026" rel="nofollow">567politics</a></p>
<script async src="https://567politics.com/embed.js"></script>

READ BEYOND 567POLITICS

Alternate sources & perspectives

Independent coverage and primary evidence to help you compare arguments. A link is not an endorsement; perspective labels describe the linked material.

Reviewed 2026-11-10. discover_politics_sources returned only generic IDF reference pages, so these sources were hand-picked from pages opened on Nov. 10, 2026. Channel 12's original Hebrew report was not opened directly; its content is known through the Times of Israel and Israel.com summaries. The Financial Times report is paywalled and was read through Anadolu Agency, Hindustan Times and Times of Israel summaries. The State Department transcript was read through a Public (pubt.io) copy because state.gov blocked automated access. No on-the-record IDF statement on the meetings and no statement from Defense Minister Israel Katz was found.

All 567politics news →